Luton Airport expansion plans scrutinised due to 'overwhelming concerns' for district's residents
- Credit: Archant
Councillors have come together to suggest ways to reduce the effects of harmful emissions associated with London Luton Airport on St Albans residents, and to halt its further expansion.
The measures, which have been put forward by the council's community, environment and sport scrutiny committee, aim to highlight the negative impact carbon emissions from the airport have on the environment and health of people living and working nearby, as well as the impact of daily noise pollution.
The council has been opposing plans for future expansion with campaigners, saying it could generate more than 40 extra flights a day.
At its meeting, the committee recommended that the chair and portfolio holder for climate, environment and transport should together encourage the government to prioritise reducing emissions, press the airport to devise plans to improve low-carbon options and ask the Department of Transport to recognise the need for the aviation industry to contribute to the UK’s target of net zero emissions by 2050.
Cllr Annie Brewster, the committee’s chair, said: “We were unanimous in putting forward recommendations that deal with some of the overwhelming concerns that our residents have about the impact the airport has on their lives.
You may also want to watch:
“The environmental impact on our district’s health is already unacceptable with zero mitigation measures offered in the air, on our railway or on our roads since the last approved doubling of passenger numbers in 2013.
RELATED STORY: Luton Airport flight path public consultation in final weeks
“Now, we are faced with two further expansion plans. An application has just been submitted for a further million passengers per year taking them to 19 million. Another, doubling current numbers to 32 million passengers a year, is expected later this year.
- 1 Residents' misery after disruption on former Butterfly World site
- 2 Special report: An insight into dog theft in Hertfordshire
- 3 Batchwood Hall COVID vaccine team warn of potential scam call
- 4 St Albans' COVID cases decline considerably as roadmap out of lockdown announced
- 5 Harpenden receives high praise from Health Secretary over vaccine
- 6 St Albans named among UK's million-pound property hotspots
- 7 What to expect with pupils heading back to the classroom
- 8 Enter Shikari collab with St Albans City for charity shirt
- 9 St Albans' Club Batchwood hailed as one of best performing COVID vaccination centres in Britain
- 10 The latest court results from the St Albans area
“We were expecting to see what mitigation plans are proposed to accompany these huge increases. However, there does not seem to be any solution to passengers driving to and from the airport from the east and the west through the district’s roads and we learned that 97 per cent of the airport’s associated carbon emissions are out of their direct control.
"They have to wait until airlines fly quieter and more fuel-efficient planes but neither of these outcomes appear to be on the horizon.
“Therefore, we feel that central government needs to make the reduction of emissions a priority for the aviation sector over increasing passenger numbers.
"Any further expansion plans should be shelved until the government has revised its aviation policy, examining post-Brexit effects and flying confidence trends as we recover from the pandemic.
“We also want to see the airport develop an action plan to reduce current noise and emissions, taking into account emissions not just from aircraft but from the considerable traffic that the airport generates in our district.
“Our local and country roads leading to the airport can be at standstill and this will only intensify if the airport expands any further.”
The recommendations from the meeting on Thursday, January 14 will go to the portfolio holder for consideration.