Oli company Total liable for giant blast at Buncefield depot
THE HIGH Court has found oil company Total liable for the Buncefield disaster which means that it could have to pay out more than �750 million in compensation claims. The blast in the early hours of a Sunday morning in December 2005 injured 43 people and
THE HIGH Court has found oil company Total liable for the Buncefield disaster which means that it could have to pay out more than �750 million in compensation claims.
The blast in the early hours of a Sunday morning in December 2005 injured 43 people and caused millions of pounds of damage to homes and businesses.
The explosion was the result of an overspillage of 300 tonnes of petrol from the top of one of the storage tanks at the Hemel Hempstead depot.
Widely thought to be the largest ever explosion in peacetime Europe, it measured 2.4 on the Richter scale and could be heard 125 miles away.
The depot was co-owned by oil companies Total and Chevron - a partnership known as Hertfordshire Oil Storage Limited (HOSL).
Total claimed that Chevron should share responsibility for the incident as HOSL was liable, but Judge David Steel ruled only Total could be held responsible because it had been negligent in the running of the site.
Most Read
- 1 Revealed: Hertfordshire's most desirable villages
- 2 10 filming locations of new Netflix series Stay Close
- 3 Ricky Gervais' Netflix series After Life filmed in Hertfordshire
- 4 Party leaders at odds over latest delay to St Albans Local Plan
- 5 Revealed: The five areas of Hertfordshire where the average home costs more than £1m
- 6 Town bank building given green light to split into three
- 7 St Albans hockey player still going strong at 80
- 8 Careers advice for St Albans children in centuries gone by
- 9 The Hairy Bikers set to ride into St Albans for this year's Pub in the Park festival
- 10 Caretakers of creation: church's work protecting environment
He explained that Total had been responsible for implementing safety measures, hiring staff and contractors - an arrangement which meant it must take all the blame.
In a statement Total said it was considering grounds for an appeal.
