Nursery scheme approved for St Albans pill-packing site
- Credit: Archant
Developers have finally found the right prescription to turn their plans into reality for a vacant site in St Albans.
A former pill packing unit in Highfield Lane, Tyttenhanger, is to be turned into a nursery for 66 children.
The property, over one-third of an acre, is owned by the NHS and was used for pharmaceutical packing and assembly for West Herts Hospitals, providing employment to local residents.
But that use ceased in March 2012, and the Pharmaceutical Packing and Assembly Service (PPAS) site has been vacant ever since.
Back in 2011 a proposal to build six homes on the site was criticised by Cllr Chris Brazier who said the site was unsuitable – that scheme was later withdrawn.
You may also want to watch:
And last year an application for a change of use from office to non-residential institution, to create a children’s day nursery was refused by St Albans district council.
However last Thursday (May 29) at the council’s planning referrals committee meeting, Seymour House Partnership’s bid for a change of use to a registered nursery went through.
- 1 Major snack brands relocate to St Albans from London
- 2 Herts county council admits too much rubbish means recycling being dumped in landfill
- 3 Council loses appeal over St Peter's Street development scheme
- 4 St Albans house prices hit record high
- 5 Nothing to hide! How I became a convert to naturism
- 6 Hertfordshire's most expensive homes 2020
- 7 11 things you might not know about St Albans' new Mayor
- 8 100 homes approved at appeal for Green Belt land
- 9 650 homes proposed for Harpenden golf club site
- 10 Property Spotlight: A family home in Harpenden's sought after East Common
The scheme had been called in to determine whether prior approval was needed, because local residents were concerned about the impact of increased traffic. The nursery will have 17 car park spaces.
On April 6 this year, a series of new permitted development rights were brought into force by the Government.
These remove the need to seek permission for different changes of use in certain circumstances, and it was under these new rules that the committee decided that prior approval was not needed.