St Albans couple outraged at “needless” felling of large ash tree
- Credit: Archant
A nature-loving St Albans couple are angry at the ‘needless’ felling of a large ash tree.
Susan and David Salter, of Colney Heath, were shocked when they came home one day to find a tree surgeon in the process of cutting down a huge ash tree which stood at the bottom of their garden.
Although the tree sits behind the back fence, in a neighbour’s garden, the Salters say it is their tree and the position of the boards was purely practical. Susan says it was put there to keep the back fences along the street in line.
The workmen halted work after the Salters raised concerns, but it turned out that the tree surgeons had been commissioned by the neighbour who had received permission from St Albans district council (SADC).
Susan claims SADC verbally admitted to her that the authorisation came from an apprentice without the authority to do so.
You may also want to watch:
While the confusion was being investigated, the job was completed.
Susan is devastated: “It’s shocking that the council allowed this to happen.
- 1 Major snack brands relocate to St Albans from London
- 2 St Albans school teacher recognised with national award
- 3 Herts county council admits too much rubbish means recycling being dumped in landfill
- 4 Home-owners' frustration over lack of action to tackle street flooding
- 5 Market gazebo trial delayed as council admits it cannot fund scheme
- 6 Hertfordshire's most expensive homes 2020
- 7 Council loses appeal over St Peter's Street development scheme
- 8 Nothing to hide! How I became a convert to naturism
- 9 11 things you might not know about St Albans' new Mayor
- 10 Pupils pause to play at St Albans primary school
“In this day and age when we are encouraged to save trees and plant new ones I question just exactly who are being employed at the council offices?
“Through bad management and its lack of communication and allowing its staff to run riot, a beautiful tree has gone.”
She would now describe the garden as barren and uninviting.
Head of housing at SADC Karen Dragovic said they do not agree that the tree belongs to the Salters: “One of our leaseholders in Richardson Place asked to take down a tree on the edge of their garden that blocked their light.
“An inspection by one of our officers confirmed that the tree was part of our leaseholder’s property.
“Furthermore, it was not protected by a Tree Preservation Order nor was it in a Conservation Area.”
She said inspectors ruled the tree was not on the Salters’ property after a second inspection: “I understand the work has since been completed and we consider the issue as closed.”
SADC has a legal duties to protect trees within its area, and the wilful destruction of a protected tree without permission carries a large fine.