Closure of The Brickyard bar in St Albans: residents group says neighbours ‘blameless’
- Credit: Archant
Neighbours who persistently complained about noise from a St Albans cocktail bar are not to blame for its sudden closure, a residents group has asserted.
Time was called on The Brickyard in Verulam Road two weekends ago, after the owner, James Hanning, blamed immediate neighbours for filing “spurious and vexatious complaints” about patrons’ noise with St Albans district council.
He accused them of having a campaign to shut down the renovated premises, formerly the closed, dilapidated pub, The Spotted Bull.
But James’s comments have been refuted by the Abbey Precincts Residents Association (APRA), with chairman Peter Trevelyan saying: “Neighbouring residents are not to blame.”
He said that it seemed “much more likely that the business model was flawed in terms of what was sustainable and appropriate on this site”.
You may also want to watch:
Peter explained: “The [former] Spotted Bull was a small local pub with a large garden. The Brickyard capacity has been greatly enlarged by building of side and rear extensions that move the focus towards neighbouring residential properties in the Conservation Area.”
James built the extensions without approval from the council, which later issued him with an enforcement notice requiring him to remove the additions.
- 1 St Albans named among UK's coldest cities
- 2 Needle spiking incident alleged at St Albans nightclub
- 3 11 questions to decide how St Albans you are!
- 4 The latest court results for the St Albans area
- 5 White Horse landlords ride off into sunset after 10 years
- 6 Our local wildlife needs your voice!
- 7 Jeffers has double helpings as St Albans City continue to wolf down their 'bread and butter' at Bath
- 8 Staff member assaulted at St Albans City FC match
- 9 Apply for free tickets to be in the audience of The Masked Singer UK in Hertfordshire
- 10 City centre road closures decision 'not a district issue'
While a planning inspector later ruled in James’s favour in his appeal against the notice, to keep the extensions, he admitted to the Herts Advertiser at the time – in late 2014 – that he had made a mistake in not waiting for planning permission.
Peter said: “Since The Brickyard opened, neighbours have consistently objected to noise and rowdy behaviour from the outside areas, in part resulting from the conversion of an open grassy pub garden into a fully paved patio courtyard up against their garden boundaries.”
He said the bar had been operated “as an open-air party venue. Some afternoon events, when the noise has been more like that of a country club, have made the use of nearby private gardens impossible without disturbance.”
Peter added: “Raucous late night parties throughout the summer of 2015 led to APRA calling for a licence review.”
At the licensing review hearing in December last year, the committee decided there was no evidence to support APRA’s allegation that The Brickyard had put public safety at risk when customers smoked on the pavement near the entrance.
Council officers visited the bar 26 times in relation to 56 complaints being logged over a nine-month-period. Some residents had made multiple complaints.
When the committee considered audio evidence submitted by APRA, it did, “not share their view that all of these incidents are public nuisance”.
But, committee members agreed that a lack of management of customers in the outside area had “directly contributed to the public nuisance.”
Peter said this suggested that neighbours’ complaints were “evidence-based and not ‘vexatious’”.
Councillors bowed to residents’ wishes and cut the opening hours of the rear patio and garden area, resulting in the bar having the earliest closing garden area in St Albans city, closing by 10pm rather than 11pm.
Peter told the Herts Advertiser: “It is difficult to believe that the business has failed because the rear garden has to be closed one hour earlier.”
James said: ”If the complaining neighbours had any genuine grievances they would have welcomed the opportunity, that I offered them, of having a professional arbiter mediate for us. They rejected this offer saying they had no need to collaborate.”
• On September 5 the planning inspectorate rejected James’s appeal against the council’s refusal to let him replace the front wall along Verulam Road, in the patio area, with a lower wall and black railings.
James said the council’s environmental compliance officer had advised him that having a lower wall and railings would help to disperse noise. But, planning inspector Hayley Butcher dismissed the appeal. Ironically, she said there was “no substantive evidence that the existing business is unviable or that refusing the appeal would directly lead to the closure of the public house.” It closed several days later.