Challenge over incinerator rejection begins today
- Credit: Archant
Giant waste company Veolia Environmental Services will this week challenge Communities Secretary Eric Pickles in the High Court over his rejection of an incinerator near St Albans.
Mr Pickles refused planning permission for Veolia’s mammoth county waste burner on Green Belt land in New Barnfield, just over one mile from Colney Heath.
The Herts Advertiser understands that while the court will not consider the merits or otherwise of the proposal, the focus will be on the legal basis of the Secretary of State’s decision.
The High Court challenge is scheduled for today and tomorrow.
Mr Pickles made his decision in July this year, in support of a planning inspector’s recommendation following a public inquiry into the contentious incinerator.
You may also want to watch:
A key part of Veolia’s challenge has already been defeated, as a court ruling in October decided that “any other harm” caused by a development does not refer just to the impact upon the Green Belt, but includes other harm.
Reasons for the planning inspector’s rejection of the scheme included harm to the Green Belt and other harm including to the nearby setting of historic Hatfield House.
- 1 14 of the best places for a curry in Hertfordshire according to readers
- 2 11 of the prettiest streets in St Albans
- 3 Campaign to save Harpenden pub which teamed up with Wheathampstead Indian restaurant
- 4 Man in his 80s dies after collision between lorry and mobility scooter
- 5 St Albans Charter Market meeting to be held in public
- 6 University of Hertfordshire paedophile caught with more than 500 child abuse images
- 7 Remembering one of Hertfordshire's best-known estate agents
- 8 Nightmare return for Joe Newton as own-goal gives St Albans City victory over Havant
- 9 Classic cars raise money for three Harpenden charities
- 10 Urgent care hub to be created at St Albans City Hospital
Cathy Roe, secretary of Hatfield Against Incineration, said the campaign group “would like residents to attend this important court case”.