Boundary changes for Harpenden constituency rejected
- Credit: Archant
CHANGES to parliamentary boundaries that could have created a new constituency covering Harpenden and parts of Bedfordshire were foiled on Tuesday following a defeat in the House of Commons.
MPs voted by 334 to 292 to delay the plans, which were aimed at slimming down the number of MPs by redrawing the electoral map until at least 2018.
As part of the shake-up it was suggested the current Hitchin and Harpenden seat, held by Tory MP Peter Lilley, would be carved up and renamed as the Mid Beds and Harpenden constituency.
Voters in Sandridge and Redbourn would join the St Albans constituency and the new seat would gain wards in Beds including Shefford, Silsoe and Shillington, Langford and Henlow Village.
Mr Lilley was unavailable to comment at the time of going to press but in a previous interview with the Herts Advertiser he said he personally did not welcome the changes and predicted they would be rejected by his coalition colleagues.
You may also want to watch:
St Albans MP Anne Main, whose seat could have gained 8,000 voters, attacked the Liberal Democrats this week for voting against the boundary review.
Mrs Main said: “I am disappointed that the Liberal Democrats did not want to progress with a bill they have previously voted for.
- 1 Farewell Paddington! Time for St Albans stalwart to say his goodbyes
- 2 National Hospitality Day: 'Per Tutti means everyone is welcome'
- 3 Revealed: Hertfordshire's most expensive villages
- 4 Help reunite toy milk jug with new owner
- 5 Traffic chaos caused by Redbourn Road works
- 6 Harpenden Food and Drink Festival returns after six years
- 7 Phantoms of the railway - the ghost lines of Welwyn and Harpenden
- 8 St Albans mum tells son's story in new book
- 9 St Albans activist joins protest blocking M25
- 10 Area Guide: The quaint Hertfordshire village of Piccotts End
“This means we will enter the next election with unequal constituencies and an extra cost of £13.5 million a year as a result of not reducing the number of MPs.
“I do not think that the public will be impressed, and this will not be easy to explain to taxpayers on the doorstep.”