Bare minimum for council standards
STANDARDS of financial management at St Albans District Council only meet minimum requirements, according to a financial watchdog. An Audit Commission annual inspection, assessing the financial management of 386 local authorities during 2007, gave St Alba
STANDARDS of financial management at St Albans District Council only meet minimum requirements, according to a financial watchdog.
An Audit Commission annual inspection, assessing the financial management of 386 local authorities during 2007, gave St Albans District Council an average score of two out of a possible four. Two is the minimum acceptable standard.
Seventy per cent of the councils assessed were rated either four or three and the remaining 30 per cent of local authorities were given a rating of either two or one.
The district council has received the same score for the last three years.
You may also want to watch:
Herts County Council was given an average score of three which is rated as consistently above minimum standards. It has also received the same score for three years in succession.
- 1 Nothing to hide! How I became a convert to naturism
- 2 Hertfordshire's most expensive homes 2020
- 3 Council loses appeal over St Peter's Street development scheme
- 4 650 homes proposed for Harpenden golf club site
- 5 St Albans house prices hit record high
- 6 100 homes approved at appeal for Green Belt land
- 7 Area Guide: The affluent Hertfordshire town of Harpenden
- 8 Police urged to increase patrols in Verulamium Park following gang attack
- 9 From Bethlehem to Nazareth - St Albans walkers' pilgrimage fundraiser
- 10 Harpenden man charged after journalist chased through Whitehall
Local authorities were assessed in five areas - financial reporting, financial management, financial standing, internal controls and value for money.
A spokesperson for St Albans council said the tests were harder each year so a council had to improve in order to achieve the same score, which they had done.
She maintained that many new measures had been recently introduced for the council to reach level three but they took time to have an effect so their benefits had not been seen in the assessment.
The areas with room for improvement were the quality of final accounts, anti-fraud measures and improving value for money, she added.