Nascot Lawn: Families taking NHS to court over decision to close Watford respite centre
- Credit: Archant
A group of parents have relaunched a legal challenge to the decision to close Nascot Lawn respite centre.
Herts Valleys Clinical Commissioning Group narrowly avoided a High Court battle earlier this year over their decision to pull £650K from the centre.
The CCG then decided to withdraw the funding anyway.
The families affected by the closure of the centre, which gives short breaks to disabled children, have asked lawyers at Irwin Mitchell to represent them.
Irwin Mitchell wrote to the CCG, stating the decision to pull funding was unlawful under the National Health Services Act and the Equality Act.
You may also want to watch:
The CCG had also failed to lawfully consult with families, according to the law firm.
After the embattled NHS group refused to back down, Irwin Mitchell started preparing for new court proceedings.
- 1 Planning permission granted for 45-home London Colney development
- 2 City centre road closures are blocking ambulances, meeting hears
- 3 11 of the prettiest streets in St Albans
- 4 Man in his 80s dies after collision between lorry and mobility scooter
- 5 Classic cars raise money for three Harpenden charities
- 6 Anti-vaxers condemned for intimidating behaviour and dangerous posters
- 7 Remembering one of Hertfordshire's best-known estate agents
- 8 Campaign to save Harpenden pub which teamed up with Wheathampstead Indian restaurant
- 9 Foodies lap up tastes of Harpenden
- 10 Traffic chaos caused by Redbourn Road works
Irwin Mitchell’s Alex Rook said: “HVCCG has said it is not required to consult with families, which in our view is unlawful.
“Our clients consider the CCG has also failed to co-operate with the Herts County Council to establish viable options for providing respite care to children who use Nascot Lawn, despite the council’s attempts to get them to do so.
“Even now there is absolutely no clarity regarding what care options are available.
“This has meant the families who rely on the vital services Nascot Lawn provides have not been able to give an informed response to the consultation.
“As throughout this process we believe the CCG has not properly considered its legal duties before reaching a decision which is likely to have a devastating impact on these families.
“We are determined to ensure the families affected by this have their voices heard on the matter.”