Nascot Lawn: Families taking NHS to court over decision to close Watford respite centre
- Credit: Archant
A group of parents have relaunched a legal challenge to the decision to close Nascot Lawn respite centre.
Herts Valleys Clinical Commissioning Group narrowly avoided a High Court battle earlier this year over their decision to pull £650K from the centre.
The CCG then decided to withdraw the funding anyway.
The families affected by the closure of the centre, which gives short breaks to disabled children, have asked lawyers at Irwin Mitchell to represent them.
Irwin Mitchell wrote to the CCG, stating the decision to pull funding was unlawful under the National Health Services Act and the Equality Act.
You may also want to watch:
The CCG had also failed to lawfully consult with families, according to the law firm.
After the embattled NHS group refused to back down, Irwin Mitchell started preparing for new court proceedings.
- 1 Nothing to hide! How I became a convert to naturism
- 2 Hertfordshire's most expensive homes 2020
- 3 650 homes proposed for Harpenden golf club site
- 4 From Bethlehem to Nazareth - St Albans walkers' pilgrimage fundraiser
- 5 100 homes approved at appeal for Green Belt land
- 6 Police urged to increase patrols in Verulamium Park following gang attack
- 7 Area Guide: The affluent Hertfordshire town of Harpenden
- 8 Could Aldi be coming to Harpenden?
- 9 Teen gang attacks boy in Verulamium Park
- 10 Harpenden man charged after journalist chased through Whitehall
Irwin Mitchell’s Alex Rook said: “HVCCG has said it is not required to consult with families, which in our view is unlawful.
“Our clients consider the CCG has also failed to co-operate with the Herts County Council to establish viable options for providing respite care to children who use Nascot Lawn, despite the council’s attempts to get them to do so.
“Even now there is absolutely no clarity regarding what care options are available.
“This has meant the families who rely on the vital services Nascot Lawn provides have not been able to give an informed response to the consultation.
“As throughout this process we believe the CCG has not properly considered its legal duties before reaching a decision which is likely to have a devastating impact on these families.
“We are determined to ensure the families affected by this have their voices heard on the matter.”