Food not forests
SIR – John Davis (Herts Advertiser, February 18) makes a strong case against taking farmland at Sandridge out of production in favour of planting trees. He suggests leaving half of it in agricultural production. Why only half of it? The arguments that app
SIR - John Davis (Herts Advertiser, February 18) makes a strong case against taking farmland at Sandridge out of production in favour of planting trees.
He suggests leaving half of it in agricultural production. Why only half of it? The arguments that apply to one half apply equally to the other.
Arable land is a valuable capital asset built up over many generations and is also an important environment for wildlife.
To lose even the smallest amount of it is to play into the hands of international agribusiness. I strongly believe that we should plant more trees wherever it is appropriate to do so, but we need to retain all the good agricultural land we can if future generations are to be well supplied with locally-sourced food after the era of cheap energy has become a distant memory.
You may also want to watch:
There is plenty of land of marginal agricultural value on which to plant trees.
To those who would say yes, but we wouldn't get our wonderful Heartwood Forest, I would argue that Hertfordshire is relatively well-endowed with attractive woodlands open to the public, most of them under-visited.
- 1 Where in Hertfordshire are the most incidents of weapon possession?
- 2 Girls 'followed' by men in red Range Rover at 2am in city centre
- 3 St Albans named among UK's most family-friendly cities
- 4 Fashionistas flock to Cathedral catwalk extravaganza
- 5 Light at the end of the gulley for long-running flooding
- 6 St Albans named among UK's coldest cities
- 7 As sewage debate continues, how have our MPs voted?
- 8 Needle spiking incident alleged at St Albans nightclub
- 9 Property Spotlight: A characterful Victorian home in Wheathampstead
- 10 Fly-tipped rubbish near Heartwood Forest set to be cleared
Lambourn Gardens, Harpenden