SIR - Whilst welcoming the refusal of planning permission for the Helioslough terminal, I find that the view I expressed at one of the earlier public meetings has not changed. It is my belief, and not mine only, that the decision to allow the development
SIR - Whilst welcoming the refusal of planning permission for the Helioslough terminal, I find that the view I expressed at one of the earlier public meetings has not changed. It is my belief, and not mine only, that the decision to allow the development was made long ago, at a high level, and that the appeals procedure is merely a public relations exercise.
The fact that a totally unnecessary loophole was provided when the plan was rejected only serves to confirm my opinion.
I have seen no challenge to the suggestion that, when built, the site will generate 3,000 lorry movements per day. Any company working on a project of this size and cost will have developed many projections of future activity, and one such projection will have been a spectrum of possible traffic levels covering from best to worst cases. It would be interesting to know what the Helioslough projections showed and astonishing if they did not present in their application the best-case scenario. Regrettably, the Freedom of Information Act probably cannot be used to force disclosure of the internal workings at the company.
You may also want to watch:
- 1 Parish council reveals £250K financial scandal over 11 years
- 2 Battle of St Albans appears on new Wars of the Roses stamp
- 3 University student digs World War One trench in St Albans garden for film project close to his heart
- 4 Knife found in churchyard by litter pickers
- 5 What are the district's best pub gardens to visit from April 12?
- 6 Elderly care charity set to close due to pandemic pressures
- 7 Harpenden and Radlett rail passengers able to use barcode readers at stations
- 8 Swimming's coming home for Harpenden as club return to refurbished base
- 9 When will the election results be counted in Herts?